According to news.com.au, 95% of Australians do not have adequate income-protection
cover (http://www.news.com.au/finance/money/face-up-to-income-protection-folly/news-story/cf947d42d33773f9d7c80f18ccbcc11e). When faced with the
options of direct and advised income protection, many do not know the various
benefits that will best work for their needs.
Between 2015 and 2016, 13% of Australians did not return to work after
an injury (https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/workers-compensation). Those who had time off
took an average of 2 weeks; and in serious cases took 9.2 weeks off from work https://www.iscrr.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/540830/118_Work-injury-in-Australia-Review-2004-2014.pdf). To cover the loss of
income, for example, during the time you are injured, you could take out either
a direct or advised income-protection policy. However, these two options have
some differences.
Price
For the 69% of Australians still without income protection (http://www.lifewise.org.au/see-more-statistics),
and searching for it, the biggest difference between advised and direct income
protection is price. On average, the cost of an advised income-protection
policy is higher than direct income protection, around 35% more. However, if
there are details listed in the fine print, this can result in the direct income
protection working out more costly. Also, some people may score on one policy while
others might not. Variables such as age, occupation, and lifestyle sins such as
smoking, could impact the premiums. However, what has the biggest impact on
price are details mentioned in the fine print.
Fine print
Going direct may offer some surprises in the small print. Firstly, when buying
a policy direct, you are not buying a solution from a financial advisor. Instead,
you are obtaining it from a salesperson working in a call centre. As such,
information may be shared. Should you wish to take the cheaper route, you will
therefore need to conduct your own research prior to a decision. Failing this,
your cheap option could turn into an expensive option. For example, if you have
pre-existing conditions, these may not be covered by the policy, cover becoming
useful at a later stage of your life. By contrast, in advised income protection,
the advisor will examine the fine print in detail. This means that when you
come to claiming, the element of surprise is likely to have been minimised.
Other important details listed in the fine print relate to the benefit
period, and partial disability. As such, advised income protection will offer a
longer benefit period − up to 70 years − whereas direct income protection will
end at 65 years of age. As for partial disability, advised income protection
will allow for partial disability; most direct-income protection plans exclude
this cover in their fine print.
Claims
In most cases, advised income-protection plans will have a peak payout
of $30 000 monthly, however, direct income protection plans will offer
much less. In most cases the claim amounts will be half that of advised income-protection
plans. However, claims may be rejected. In 2016, up to 37% claims were
rejected, of which 25% were for trauma cases (http://asic.gov.au/about-asic/media-centre/find-a-media-release/2016-releases/16-347mr-asic-issues-industry-review-of-life-insurance-claims/).
Overall information before
signing any contract
In some cases, with direct-income protection your application may be
rejected if you do not fit neatly within all the boxes. However, when comparing
this to advised income-protection plans, the difference is that a financial
advisor may be able to find a more suitable cover plan if you have certain
health issues.

Comments
Post a Comment